Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Discovery Africa Ltd v Nichol [2015] FCA 1497 Citation: Discovery Africa Ltd v Nichol [2015] FCA 1497
Parties: DISCOVERY AFRICA LIMITED (ACN 147 324 847) v KEVIN WILLIAM NICHOL, DANIE VAN DEN BERGH, SINDISE MINING CC, IAN BERT LOVETT, PHILLIP ANDREW THICK, PETER JAMES AVERY and CBP PTY LTD (ACN 166 080 682)
File number: WAD 87 of 2014
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 23 December 2015
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – whether the relevant payments constituted Termination payments for the purposes of Part 2D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) –whether the payments constituted a "benefit" paid to the respondents – resignation as directors of the applicant company – execution of deeds of release – whether the payments were made "in connection with" retirement as a director of the company – whether the "benefits" are exempt under s 200F – whether the "benefits" were approved pursuant to s 200E – whether the applicant is estopped from asserting that the first respondent is not entitled to the termination payment – whether deed of release acts as a bar to the claim. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – whether the respondents have a reasonable prospect of success of defending the claim.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss s 200AA, 200AB(1), 200B, 200D, 200E, s 200F(2), 200J(1)(a) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 87, 90 and 117 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01, 29.07
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate