Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1520 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1520
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v COLGATE-PALMOLIVE PTY LTD (ACN 002 792 163), PZ CUSSONS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 164 827), PAUL ANSELL and WOOLWORTHS LIMITED (ACN 000 014 675)
File number: NSD 2510 of 2013
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 15 October 2015
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – interlocutory application seeking discovery orders – special discovery pursuant to r 20.15 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether discovery orders sought will facilitate the just resolution of the proceedings as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible – whether discovery orders sought are consistent with the overarching purpose in Pt VB of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether discovery orders sought are necessary in the interests of a fair trial or the fair disposition of the proceedings
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Pt VB Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 20.15 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 45, 155
Cases cited: Alanco Australia Pty Ltd v Higgins (No 2) [2011] FCA 1063 Trade Practices Commission v CC (New South Wales) Pty Limited (No 4) (1995) 58 FCR 426
Date of hearing: 15 October 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate