Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sevdalis v Director of Professional Services Review [2016] FCA 32 File number: VID 309 of 2015
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 2 February 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to restrict access to, or publication of, documents from disciplinary procedures under professional review scheme – legislative prohibition on disclosure to a 'person' – whether disclosure to Court falls within prohibition
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) ss 82, 93, 106Q, 106U, 106ZPR, 106ZR
Cases cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Nestle Australia Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 257 Kizon v Palmer (1997) 72 FCR 409
Date of hearing: 28 January 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Winneke SC with Mr B Jellis
Solicitor for the Applicant: Perry Maddocks and Trollope Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Knowles
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz Lawyers
ORDERS VID 309 of 2015
BETWEEN: NICHOLAS SEVDALIS Applicant
AND: DIRECTOR OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW (AS APPOINTED UNDER S 83 OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE ACT 1973 (CTH)) First Respondent
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO 885 Second Respondent
DETERMINING AUTHORITY (AS ESTABLISHED UNDER S 106Q OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE ACT 1973 (CTH)) Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate