Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Selth v Australasian Barrister Chambers Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 46 File number(s): NSD 975 of 2014 NSD 1019 of 2014
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 28 January 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application for adjournment of the trial – consideration of an application for leave to bring a cross-claim – consideration of an application to set aside a notice to produce – consideration of an application for leave to appeal from the exercise of the discretion to refuse the adjournment of the trial
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011, r 20.31
Cases cited: Enviro Pak Pty Ltd v New Horticulture Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 624 - cited
Date of hearing: 28 January 2016
Date of last submissions: 28 January 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M O'Meara
Solicitor for the Applicants Webb Henderson
Counsel for the Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr D Minus
ORDERS NSD 975 of 2014 BETWEEN: PHILIP SELTH IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY FOR THE MEMBERS OF THE AUSTRALIAN BAR ASSOCIATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate