Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZWCO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 51 Appeal from: SZWCO v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1760
File number: NSD 855 of 2015
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – visa – application for a protection visa – refusal by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection – review of the delegate's decision by the Refugee Review Tribunal – dismissal by Refugee Review Tribunal on the basis that the applicant did not have a well-founded fear of risk of persecution or harm – where the Refugee Review Tribunal considered that the applicant had exaggerated his claims – application for judicial review in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where primary judge refused leave to amend the application – appeal from the primary judge's dismissal of the application – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to consider a claim or integer of a claim – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision was based on irrational or illogical reasoning ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – jurisdictional error – whether Refugee Review Tribunal failed to consider claim or integer of a claim – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision was infected by irrational or illogical reasoning PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeals – amended application – whether appellant should be granted leave to amend notice of appeal to include new grounds not argued at first instance
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 46A, 91R, 476A Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25(1AA) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 36.01(2)(c)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate