Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tax Practitioners Board v Lamede Group Proprietary Limited [2016] FCA 63 File number: QUD 125 of 2014
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of judgment: 10 February 2016
Catchwords: TAXATION – contraventions of ss 50-5(1) and 50-10(1) of the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) – where admitted – whether declaratory and injunctive relief appropriate – imposition of pecuniary penalties
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Cth) s 232(4) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious Drugs, Identity Crime and Other Measures) Act 2012 (Cth) Sch 3, Pt 2, item 9(1) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 4.01, 40.02 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 4-5 Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50-1(1), 50-10(1), 50-15, 70-5, 90-1(2), 90-5
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Alvaton Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 760 FV v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 237 Secretary, Department of Health & Ageing v Prime Nature Prize Pty Ltd (in liq) [2010] FCA 597 Tax Practitioners Board v Dedic [2014] FCA 307 Tax Practitioners Board v Dedic [2014] FCA 511 Tax Practitioners Board v Hinckfuss [2013] FCA 1168
Date of hearing: 27 March 2015
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate