Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Insolvency Guardian Melbourne Pty Ltd v Carlei [2016] FCA 72 File number: QUD 99 of 2016
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 9 February 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders r 7.32 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – reasons provided for respondents' benefit – criteria that must be satisfied for the court to grant a freezing order – applicant must establish 'a good arguable case' on a prospective cause of action – freezing order granted
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.32, 7.32(1), 7.32(2), 7.33, 7.35 Corporations Act 2011 (Cth) ss 180, 182, 183
Cases cited: Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App Bayley and Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 746 BGC Contracting Pty Ltd v Western Australian Construction Hire Pty Ltd [2010] WASC 25 Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 18; (1999) 198 CLR 380 Eaves v Hickson (1861) 30 Beav 136, 141; (1861) 54 ER 840 Frigo v Culhaci (unreported; Court of Appeal of NSW,17 July 1998) National Australia Bank Ltd v Bond Brewing Holdings Ltd [1990] HCA 10; (1990) 169 CLR 271 Ninemia Maritime Corp v Trave Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG [1984] 1 All ER 398 Perdaman Chemicals & Fertilisers Pty Ltd v The Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd [2011] WASC 188 PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd [2015] HCA 36; (2015) 89 ALJR 975
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate