Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd (No 7) [2016] FCA 96 File number: VID 828 of 2009
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – costs of interlocutory application following determination of principal proceeding – where applicants sought costs order against legal practitioner for failure to disclose call option deed alleged to affect the applicants' conduct of proceedings – where applicants unsuccessful in principal proceeding – whether practitioner engaged in conduct disentitling him of costs – whether seriousness of allegations against practitioner justified indemnity costs order
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 32 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – ss 37M and 37N Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 223 – cited Camm v Linke Nominees Pty Ltd (No 5) [2015] FCA 431 – cited Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 – cited Re Skase; Ex parte Donnelly (1992) 37 FCR 509 – cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 25
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr DD Keane
Solicitor for the Applicants: Piper Alderman
Counsel for Mr Broadley: Mr DEF Chesterman
Solicitor for Mr Broadley: Coyne & Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate