Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ram v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 98 Appeal from: Ram & Anor v Minister for Immigration and Protection & Anor [2015] FCCA 2972
File number(s): NSD 1506 of 2015
Judge(s): GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2016
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 34 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99 WAGP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 103
Date of hearing: 10 February 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Appeared in person with the aid of an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms N Blake
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 1506 of 2015 BETWEEN: RAKESH RATISH RAM Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION Respondent
JUDGE: GILMOUR J DATE OF ORDER: 12 FEBRUARY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application to extend time within which to appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicant's jointly and severally pay the costs of the first respondent. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
GILMOUR J: 1 This is an application pursuant to r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) (Rules), for an extension of time within which to appeal from a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court delivered on 21 October 2015 dismissing applications for judicial review of a decision made by the former Migration Review Tribunal (Tribunal). The Tribunal, in turn, had affirmed a decision of a delegate (Delegate) of the first respondent (Minister) to refuse to grant to each of the applicants a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa (student visa). 2 The applicants were directed to file and serve any written submissions by 27 January 2016. Short written submissions were filed in the first week of February 2016.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate