Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 102 File number: VID 73 of 2015
Judge: MURPHY J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to vary or set aside costs order; application to set aside costs estimate made under r 40.20 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) –whether costs estimate is a judgment or order – whether costs in appeal should be treated as costs of interlocutory application
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v ActiveSuper Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 318 Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 119 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Mammoet Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (2012) 209 FCR 123; [2012] FCA 1404 Director, Office of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) (2013) 209 FCR 297; [2013] FCAFC 34 Donald Fuller v Minister for Primary Industries & Energy, National Registration Authority [1998] FCA 377 Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 416 Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 2) 2015 FCA 88 Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] FCA 1084 Finch v The Heat Group Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 182 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (No 2) [2014] FCA 917
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate