Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZUUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 123 Appeal from: SZUUR v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2532
File number: NSD 1311 of 2015
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 18 February 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether the appellants were denied procedural fairness in circumstances where the Tribunal proceeded to determine their review application when the appellants failed to attend the scheduled hearing – where the appellants misspelt their street name (omitting the letter 'r') in the "Your contact details in Australia" and "Where do you want us to send correspondence about your application" sections of the application for review form lodged with the Tribunal – where the invitation to attend the Tribunal hearing was sent to that address – where the appellants allege that the invitation was sent to the wrong address and that they did not receive it – where the street name was similarly misspelt in documents provided to the Department and the Federal Circuit Court – where the appellants admitted to having received other documents sent to the address with the misspelt street name – whether the appellants were deemed to have received the invitation to attend the Tribunal hearing – consideration of ss 425, 441A and 441C of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 425, 425A, 426A, 441A, 441C
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 77; [2000] FCA 377 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIZO (2009) 238 CLR 627 SZUUR v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCCA 2532 Xie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 172
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate