Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hawkins (Inspection Application by Matrix Group and Anor) [2016] FCA 164 File number: NSD 1703 of 2015
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 1 March 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – request to inspect documents on court file – leave required to inspect documents –factors relevant to grant of leave – principle of open justice – affidavits and exhibits read in open court – information of taxpayers protected from disclosure – whether granting leave to inspect documents would give impermissible forensic advantage – whether granting leave to inspect documents would deprive party of benefit of implied undertaking not to use documents obtained in litigation for another purpose
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 9 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 17, 37AE Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32(2), 2.32(4), 20.03(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1 ss 355-25(1), 355-30(1), 355-50(1)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distributors Ltd (No 3) [2002] FCA 609 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell [2003] 8 VR 571 Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 1) [2014] FCA 1232 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 Hewson v Gothard (2014) 222 FCR 59 Oldham v Capgemini Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1149 Patrick v Capital Finance Pty Ltd (No 4) [2003] FCA 436 R v Davis (1995) 57 FCR 512 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 9) (2008) 148 FCR 1 Van Stokkum v The Finance Brokers Supervisory Board [2002] WASC 192
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate