Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sklavos v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2016] FCA 179 File number(s): NSD 992 of 2013
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 March 2016
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – Discrimination – Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) – direct and/or indirect discrimination – whether adjustments sought reasonable or imposed undue hardship – whether applicant treated less favourably – identification of relevant comparator – whether less favourable treatment upon basis of disability CONTRACTS – construction – incorporation of terms –whether contractual in nature – terms implied by law – whether breach of contract established NEGLIGENCE – Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) – duty of care – special relationships and duties – whether duty to prevent psychiatric injury – standard of care – whether precautions could have been taken in disciplinary process – causation – pre-existing likelihood of developing injury. Held: Application dismissed
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 3, 46PO Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4-6, 11, 12, 19, 21A, 22, 27, 29, 32 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) s 3D Health Insurance Regulations 1975 (Cth) r 4, sch 4 Disability Standards for Education 2005 paras 5.2, 6.2 Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ss 5-5E, 11A-14, 16, 27-29, 31, 32
Cases cited: Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon [1993] HCA 4; (1993) 176 CLR 344 Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Stavar [2009] NSWCA 258; (2009) 75 NSWLR 649 Catholic Education Office v Clarke [2004] FCAFC 197; (2004) 138 FCR 121 CGU Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd v Garcia [2007] NSWCA 193; (2007) 69 NSWLR 680 Commonwealth Bank v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [1997] FCA 1311; (1997) 80 FCR 78 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 2; (2002) 209 CLR 95 Goldman Sachs JBWere Services Pty Limited v Nikolich [2007] FCAFC 120; (2007) 163 FCR 62 James v Royal Bank of Scotland [2015] NSWSC 243 Marmax Investments Pty Ltd v RPR Maintenance Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 127 Mount Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey [1970] HCA 60; (1970) 125 CLR 383 New South Wales v Seedsman [2000] NSWCA 119; (2000) 217 ALR 583 New South Wales v Spearpoint [2009] NSWCA 233 Nikolich v Goldman Sachs J B Were Services Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 784 Purvis v New South Wales [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92 Riverwood International Australia Pty Ltd v McCormick [2000] FCA 889; (2000) 177 ALR 193 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 177; (2014) 231 FCR 403 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd [1979] HCA 51; (1979) 144 CLR 596 Shahid v Australasian College of Dermatologists [2008] FCAFC 72; (2008) 168 FCR 46 State of New South Wales v Paige [2002] NSWCA 235; (2002) 60 NSWLR 371 Strong v Woolworths Ltd t/as Big W [2012] HCA 5; (2012) 246 CLR 182 Sullivan v Moody [2001] HCA 59; (2001) 207 CLR 562 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165 Watts v Australian Postal Corporation [2014] FCA 370; (2014) 222 FCR 220 Wicks v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [2010] HCA 22; (2010) 241 CLR 60 Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCAFC 120; (2014) 319 ALR 378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate