Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZWDA v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 183 Appeal from: SZWDA v Minister for Immigration [2015] FCCA 2621
File number: NSD 1273 of 2015
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 23 February 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal – where delay is not excessive – where delay does not prejudice the respondent – where there is adequate explanation for the delay – whether ground of appeal has sufficient prospect of success to warrant grant of extension of time – whether Federal Circuit Court erred in finding applicant had sufficient time to file supporting documents – refusal of adjournment not unreasonable – proposed ground of appeal has no prospect of success – gratuitous addition of further subject to post-hearing written submissions directed to address a particular subject – refusal by Federal Circuit Court to consider that further subject – no denial of procedural fairness – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal dismissed. MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration and Refugees Division) – application for Protection (Class XA) visa – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Federal Circuit Court considered information relevant to the applicant's circumstances – whether the Federal Circuit Court failed to take into account all of the applicant's claims.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd [No 1] (1981) 147 CLR 246 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Sullivan v The Civil Aviation Authority (2014) 226 FCR 555; (2014) 141 ALD 540; [2014] FCAFC 93 Tinkler v Elliott [2012] EWCA Civ 1289
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate