Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 192 File number: NSD 756 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 4 March 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out pleadings – application for summary dismissal – whether pleading disclosed reasonable cause of action – whether no reasonable prospect of success – pleading dependent upon drawing of inferences – whether sufficient identification of material facts from which inferences to be drawn
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A(2), 31A(3) Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 16.21(1)(b), 16.21(1)(c), 16.21(1)(d), 16.21(1)(e), 26.01(1)
Cases cited: Adunat Pty Ltd v ITW Construction Systems Australia Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 499 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pauls Ltd (2000) ATPR 41-747 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Trading Post Australia Pty Ltd (2011) 197 FCR 498 Compaq Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Merry & Ors (1998) 157 ALR 1 Fernandez v Glev Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1859 J & A Vaughan Super Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Becton Property Group Limited [2014] FCA 581 Kanakaridis v Westpac Banking Corporation [2015] FCA 1146 Mulhern v Bank of Queensland [2015] FCA 44 Ridgway v Consolidated Energy Corporation Pty Ltd (1987) ATPR 40-754 Tameeka Group Pty Ltd v Landan Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1218
Date of hearing: 9 December 2015
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate