Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Soden v Croker (No 3) [2016] FCA 249 File number: NSD 1392 of 2014
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – general principle that costs follow the event applied – where lump sum award of costs is appropriate under rule 40.02 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v Croker [2010] NSWSC 942 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Commonwealth v Croker [2010] FMCA 852 Ginos Engineers Pty Ltd v Autodesk Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1051 Julien v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (No 2) [2009] FCA 1259 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229 Scott v Secretary, Department of Social Security (No 2) [2000] FCA 1450 Soden v Croker (No 2) [2016] FCA 15
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms D Ward
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not file any submissions or evidence in relation to the issue of costs
ORDERS NSD 1392 of 2014
BETWEEN: WARWICK SODEN (IN HIS CAPACITY AS REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA) Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate