Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perazzoli v BankSA (No 2) [2016] FCA 260 File number: SAD 307 of 2014
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 16 March 2016
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE – common law principles governing privilege – solicitor/client relationship – whether real prospect of litigation – where preliminary consideration of possible class action by solicitors to secure funding by litigation funder – onus of establishing dominant purpose of giving or obtaining legal advice or for use in actual or reasonably anticipated legal proceedings PRIVILEGE – claim of privilege by applicants bringing class action – whether legal professional privilege attaches to confidential communications between lawyers and proposed class action group members – communication prior to agreement with a litigation funder – communication prior to the institution of proceedings – whether advice is unsolicited – whether privilege is waived – claim of privilege by trustee in bankruptcy – communications relating to bankruptcy proceedings – whether it is available to the trustee to explore the availability of a claim by investors – where the trustee is not a party to the proceedings
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Cases cited: Perazzoli v BankSA [2015] FCA 373 Esso Australia Resources v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 136 FCR 357 Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (2009) 174 FCR 547 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 Sydney Airports Corporation Ltd v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2005] NSWCA 47 Melrose Cranes and Rigging Pty Ltd v Manitowoc Crane Group Australia Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 904 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 5) (2006) 155 FCR 30 Barnes v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 242 ALR 601 Asahi Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd v Pacific Equity Partners Pty Ltd (No 4) [2014] FCA 796 Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v International Litigation Funding Partners Pte Ltd (No 2) (2009) 180 FCR 1 Mitsubishi Electric Australia Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (2002) 4 VR 332 Ensham Resources Pty Ltd v AIOI Insurance Company Ltd (2012) 209 FCR 1 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2014] FCA 1316 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 Players Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (receivers appointed) v Clone Pty Ltd (2013) 115 SASR 547 Archer Capital 4A Pty Ltd (as trustee for the Archer Capital Trust 4A) v Sage Group plc (No 3) (2013) 306 ALR 414; [2013] FCA 1160 Apple Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Wiley [2002] NSWSC 855 Re Southland Coal Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 899 Varawa v Howard Smith & Co Ltd (1910) 10 CLR 382 Karounos v Official Trustee (1898) 19 FCR 330 Griffin v Pantzer (2004) 137 FCR 209 Donnelly v Scott [2001] FCA 782 Evans v Wainter (2005) 145 FCR 176 Re Excel Finance Corporation Ltd; Worthley v England (1994) 52 FCR 69 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 Re Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (in liq); Bond v England (1997) 25 ACSR 394 Attorney-General (NT) v Kearney (1985) 158 CLR 500 Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance (1997) 188 CLR 501 Re Moage Ltd (in liquidation); Sheahan v Pitterino (1998) 82 FCR 10 Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate