Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BYE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 263 Appeal from: BYE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 3023
File number: NSD 1463 of 2015
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 9 February 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appellant applied in 2009 for a protection (Class XA) visa – after Refugee Review Tribunal refused application and s 36(2)(aa) added to Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applicant alleged that his original protection (Class XA) visa application was invalid because it did not make any claim under Refugees Convention and in 2014 made new application for protection (Class XA) visa – delegate refused to accept new application pursuant to s 48A of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether cl 866.211(a) of Sch 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) required specific claims be made under the Refugees Convention to satisfy the criterion for making a valid application Held: cl 866.211(a) did not require specific Convention ground to be identified in making an application for a protection visa – sufficient that a substantial and articulate argument based on established facts is made in Form 866C
Legislation: Convention relating to the Status of Refugees Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: AZABF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 174 BAL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 189 ALR 566 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 at 394 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 SZGIZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 212 FCR 235
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate