Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 309 File number: NSD 756 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – where each party enjoyed a measure of success – whether the court should depart from the rule that costs follow the event – respondent ordered to pay a percentage of the applicant's costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 43(1), 43(2), 43(3) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 1.39
Cases cited: DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited v InterTAN Inc [2004] FCA 1251 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) ATPR 40-748 Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 192 Spotwire Pty Limited v Visa International Service Association [2004] FCA 1481
Date of hearing: 9 December 2015
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S C G Burley SC with him Mr B Le Plastrier
Solicitor for the Applicant: Birchall Legal
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J O'Sullivan
Solicitor for the Respondents: & Legal
ORDERS NSD 756 of 2015
BETWEEN: QUALIFY ME PTY LTD ACN 165 025 874 Applicant
AND: GET QUALIFIED AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 144 813 543 First Respondent
ADAM WADI Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate