Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Huynh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 314 File number: WAD 722 of 2015
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – applicant convicted of assault with intent to rob – Minister exercised discretion to cancel resident return visa under s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Minister failed to take into account a relevant consideration or took into account an irrelevant consideration – whether Minister's decision was legally unreasonable – application dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 4, s 195A, s 200, s 501, s 501(1), s 501(2), s 501(6), s 501(6)(a), s 501(7)(c)
Cases cited: Brown v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 183 FCR 113; [2010] FCAFC 33 Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58. Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Huynh v Minister for Immigration [2003] FMCA 207 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Eden [2016] FCAFC 28 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li and Another (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang and Others (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Huynh [2004] FCAFC 47 Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 230 FCR 367; [2015] FCAFC 54 Regina v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Stretton v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) (2015) 231 FCR 36; [2015] FCA 559 Te Puke v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 230 FCR 499; [2015] FCA 398 The State of Western Australia v Huynh [2011] WASCSR 192
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate