Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TRHL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 376 Appeal from: TRHL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] AATA 803
File number: WAD 658 of 2015
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 19 April 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal on questions of law under s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) against a decision revoking the appellant's citizenship - circumstances permitting a revocation of citizenship under s 34 of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) – whether the AAT correctly interpreted the state of satisfaction required as to enliven the discretion in s 34(2) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) – whether the AAT considered separately whether to exercise its discretion to revoke the Appellant's citizenship
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1) Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) s 13(1) Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) ss 4(1)(b), 22(9)(a), 34(2) Australian Citizenship (Transitionals and Consequentials) Act 2007 (Cth)
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) (2009) 239 CLR 27 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280 McKinnon v Secretary, Department of Treasury (2005) 145 FCR 70 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Tran [2015] FCA 546 Minister for Immigration and Ethic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Osorio v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] AATA 59 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379 WBU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] 45 AAR 225
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate