Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Traljesic v Bosnia and Herzegovina [2016] FCA 383 File number: VID 497 of 2015
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 20 April 2016
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – review under s 21 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – extradition objection – section 7(c) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – whether substantial grounds for believing applicant may be punished by reason of his political opinions or religion if extradited – meaning of 'punished' in s 7(c) of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – state responsibility for conduct of prisoners – relevance of duty of care to prisoner EVIDENCE – applicability of rules of evidence in reviews under s 21 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – applicability of ss 59 and 135 of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to exclude documents that were before the Magistrate in decision under review
Legislation: Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Arts 28, 166, 323 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 3, 5, 7, 7(a), 7(b), 7(c), 12(1), 15(2), 16(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(2)(d), 19(6), 19(7), 19(8), 19(9), 21, 21(1)(a), 21(2)(b), 21(6)(d), 21A, 21A(2), 21A(2)(a), 21A(2)(d), 22, 22(3)(f), 22(5) Extradition Act 1989 (UK) s 6(1)(d) Extradition Act 2003 (UK) s 13(b) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 4, 59, 135, 135(a), 135(b) Extradition Bill 1987 (Cth) Extradition (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Regulations 2009 (Cth) reg 4 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 4.12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate