Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nicovations Australia Pty Ltd v Secretary of the Department of Health [2016] FCA 394 File number: NSD 1274 of 2015
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2016
Catchwords: HEALTH LAW – Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods – application for registration of therapeutic goods, being a Voke Inhalator nicotine 0.43 mg pressurised inhalation aerosol can – Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) s 23 – whether application made in accordance with a form approved by the Secretary – whether application effective – whether application made in accordance with s 23 for the purposes of s 25 of the Therapeutic Goods Act so that the Secretary must evaluate the goods for registration – whether letter of 16 October 2015 constituted or evidenced an "initial decision" within s 60 of the Therapeutic Goods Act ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – whether letter of 16 October 2015 constituted a "decision" for the purposes of that Act – jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – officer of Therapeutic Goods Administration treating an application for registration of therapeutic goods as not being made in accordance with s 23 of the Therapeutic Goods Act because not made in accordance with a particular form approved by the Secretary – whether error so as to found a remedy under s 39B of the Judiciary Act or under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 25C, 33 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 3(3) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 7 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) ss 23, 25, 31, 60 Poisons Standard 2015 (Cth) Sch 4 Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 (Cth) regs 16C, 16D, 16F, 16G, Sch 10 Pt 1 and Pt 3
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate