Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
LX v Commonwealth of Australia [2016] FCA 441 File numbers: SAD 186 of 2015 SAD 187 of 2015
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 29 April 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Australian Crime Commission – validity of summons issued under section 28 of Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – validity of Australian Crime Commission Special Investigation Authorisation & Determination (Highest Risk Criminal Targets No 2) 2013 – whether Board considered whether ordinary police methods of investigation likely to be effective pursuant to s 7C(3) of Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – whether State offences have a federal aspect within the terms of s 4A of Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – whether Determination too broad to satisfy statutory requirements – whether Determination unreasonable. Held: Application dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6 Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 4, 4A, 7, 7B, 7C, 8, 9, 24A, 28 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B National Crime Authority Act 1984 (Cth) s 13
Cases cited: AB v National Crime Authority (1998) 85 FCR 538 George v Rockett and Another (1990) 170 CLR 104 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh and Another (2014) 231 FCR 437 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li and Another (2013) 249 CLR 332 National Crime Authority v A1 (1997) 75 FCR 274 Queensland Bacon Proprietary Ltd v Rees (1966) 115 CLR 266 XCIV v Australian Crime Commission (2015) 234 FCR 274 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate