Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HFPS Pty Limited (Trustee) v Tamaya Resources Limited (In Liq) (No 2) [2016] FCA 446 File number: NSD 529 of 2014
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend their Originating Application and Amended Statement of Claim in this proceeding in circumstances where the proposed amendments were instigated as the result of applications made in other proceedings intended to be tried at the same time as this proceeding and in order to ensure that the substance of the case advanced in this proceeding was the same as the cases advanced in the other proceedings
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1041E Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 33K, 33ZF, 37M, 37N
Cases cited: HFPS Pty Limited (Trustee) v Tamaya Resources Limited (In Liq) (No 1) [2016] FCA 442 ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional Council (2014) 224 FCR 1 Selig v Wealthsure Pty Ltd (2015) 320 ALR 47 Tamaya Resources Ltd (In Liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2015] FCA 1098 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate