Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 460 File number: NSD 756 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 5 May 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – whether indemnity costs ought to be payable where the amendment of pleadings go beyond that for which leave granted by the Court – whether costs should be payable forthwith
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.02(a)
Cases cited: Cirillo v Consolidated Press Property Ltd (formerly known as Citicorp Australia Limited) (No 2) [2007] FCA 179 GAIN Capital UK Limited v Citigroup Inc (No 2) [2016] FCA 243 Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 192 Qualify Me Pty Ltd v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 309 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B Le Plastrier
Solicitor for the Applicant: Birchall Legal
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J O'Sullivan
Solicitor for the Respondents: & Legal
ORDERS NSD 756 of 2015
BETWEEN: QUALIFY ME PTY LTD ACN 165 025 874 Applicant
AND: GET QUALIFIED AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 144 813 543 First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate