Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Veda Advantage Limited v Malouf Group Enterprises Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 470 File number: NSD 1101 of 2014
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 5 May 2016
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY — trade marks — relief — whether permanent injunction should be granted where undertaking made to court CONSUMER LAW — contraventions of Australian Consumer Law — misleading or deceptive conduct and false representations as to sponsorship, affiliation or approval — relief — whether permanent injunction should be granted where undertaking made to court COSTS — where applicant only partially successful — whether respondent should pay a percentage of applicant's costs or whether applicant should pay respondent's costs on either an indemnity or ordinary basis
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(2)
Cases cited: Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphos Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 4WD Systems Pty Ltd (2003) 200 ALR 491; [2003] FCA 850 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dateline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (2007) 161 FCR 513 Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon (1991) 22 NSWLR 1 Barnes v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 19 Black v Lipovac (1998) 217 ALR 386; [1998] FCA 699 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Forbes v Samuel [1913] 3 KB 706 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authority (No 2) (2005) 13 VR 435 Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd (2006) 154 FCR 425 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Ragata Developments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1993) 217 ALR 175 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Sagacious Legal Pty Ltd v Wesfarmers General Insurance Ltd [2011] FCAFC 53 Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Limited v LG Electronics Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 477 Veda Advantage Limited v Malouf Group Enterprises Pty Limited [2016] FCA 255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate