Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZUCJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 471 Appeal from: SZUCJ & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No 2) [2015] FCCA 3266
File number(s): NSD 9 of 2016
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2016
Date of hearing: 2 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 52
Counsel for the First Appellant: The First Appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Second and Third Appellants: The Second and Third Appellants did not appear.
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr M Cleary
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
ORDERS NSD 9 of 2016
BETWEEN: SZUCJ First Appellant
SZUCL Second Appellant
SZUCM Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 6 MAY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appellants' appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellants are to pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
SIOPIS J: 1 The appellants are a husband, wife and their child. The appellants are citizens of Pakistan and are Sunni Muslims. 2 The appellants applied to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection for protection visas on 24 August 2012 on the grounds that the first and second appellants faced persecution on the basis of their religion if they were to return to Pakistan. A delegate of the first respondent (the Minister) refused to grant the visas on 7 December 2012. 3 The appellants applied to the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) for review of the delegate's decision by letter from their migration agent on 23 December 2012.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate