Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CPD15 as litigation guardian for CGE15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 475 Appeal from: CGE15 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCCA 173
File number: NSD 213 of 2016
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – protection visa – appellant's mother appointed as litigation guardian – where appellant claims to fear harm as a "black child" in China because he was born to unmarried parents and in breach of China's family planning laws – where appellant's father imprisoned in Australia for drug related offences – where appellant claims to fear harm as a "son of a criminal" – where appellant's parents claim they are unable to pay the social compensation fee in China for the appellant as an "extra child" and "unmarried fertility" – where appellant's parents and an older sibling made individual protection claims which were unsuccessful – whether Tribunal failed to properly consider claims – whether Tribunal biased – whether Tribunal gave adequate reasons – whether Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations – whether appellant denied procedural fairness – whether Tribunal asked irrelevant questions – consideration of ss 36(2) and 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 424A, 425, 476(2), 476A
Cases cited: CGE15 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCCA 173 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507; [2001] HCA 17 SCAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 668
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate