Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tameeka Group Pty Ltd v Landan Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 480 File number: NSD 969 of 2015
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend pleadings – where application to amend pleadings was foreshadowed on the first day of hearing – where proposed amendments are confined to legal question of construction
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 r 8.21, 8.21(1)(g)(i), 16.53
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Carter, in the matter of Spec FS NSW Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (2013) 225 FCR 79 Darcy v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 807 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640 Research in Motion Ltd v Samsung Electronics Australia Ltd (2009) 176 FCR 66 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm), in the matter of Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) [2015] FCA 1098 Tameeka Group Pty Ltd v Landan Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1218 Wotton v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 910
Dates of hearing: 27 April 2016, 28 April 2016, 29 April 2016 and 2 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate