Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dunn v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 489 File number: VID 827 of 2015
Judge: NORTH ACJ
Date of judgment: 10 May 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – automatic cancellation of Class TY Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa under s 501(3A) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – applicant convicted of serious crime and did not pass character test – decision to refuse to revoke cancellation under s 501CA(4) – exercise of discretion under s 501CA(4) – whether jurisdictional errors in decision of Minister – Held: no evidence for critical finding that if applicant reoffended he posed a risk to Australian community, amounting to jurisdictional error – decision of Minister quashed.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501(3A), 501CA(4), 501G
Date of hearing: 17 March 2016
Date of last submissions: 28 April 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Gilbert
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clothier Anderson & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Knowles
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
ORDERS VID 827 of 2015
BETWEEN: CLIVE RONALD DUNN Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH ACJ DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the respondent to refuse to revoke the cancellation of the applicant's Class TY Subclass 444 Special Category (Temporary) visa made on 2 September 2015 is quashed. 2. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate