Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AXG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 492 Appeal from: AXG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 3259
File number: QUD 1152 of 2015
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 4 May 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Protection (Class XA) visa application – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Federal Circuit Court failed to find that Tribunal should have applied the "What if I am wrong?" test – whether Federal Circuit Court failed to find that Tribunal engaged in illogical, irrational and unreasonable reasoning – adverse credibility finding – Tribunal Reasons are to be read in context as a whole and not piecemeal – so read, Tribunal not in doubt as to absence of credibility – Tribunal not bound to consider that findings as to appellant's evidence might be wrong – no jurisdictional error – appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2)(a)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 321 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang, (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingham (1999) 93 FCR 220 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Abebe (1999) 73 ALJR 584 SFGB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALD 402 SZLGP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 181 FCR 113 SZVAP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 233 FCR 451
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate