Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BFT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 499 Appeal from: BFT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCCA 3338
File number: NSD 12 of 2016
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 11 May 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for protection visa – appellant citizen of Sri Lanka – whether Tribunal under obligation to verify the contents of a document submitted by the appellant in support of his protection claims – whether Tribunal failed to assess the appellant's protection claims – appeal dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to raise new grounds on appeal that were not raised in the proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether expedient and in the interests of justice to grant leave – consideration of the merits of the proposed new grounds of appeal – where grounds set out in the original notice of appeal not pressed – leave not granted – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.43(3)(b), Sch 3 item 15.1(d)
Cases cited: Applicant A169 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 8 BFT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] 3338 MZWBW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 94 NAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 76 NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 147 FCR 51; [2005] FCAFC 134 SZOHC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 118 ALD 522; [2010] FCA 1213
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate