Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IPC Global Pty Ltd v Pavetest Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 500 File number: NSD 1203 of 2015
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 11 May 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to amend pleadings – whether leave should be granted to plead copyright infringement in relation to applicant's firmware
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011, rules 8.21(1), 16.53
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 187 FCR 261 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm), in the matter of Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) [2015] FCA 1098 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 4 May 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 36
Counsel for the Applicant: R Cobden SC with E Bathurst
Solicitor for the Applicant: Bird & Bird
Counsel for the Respondents: CP Thompson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Stephens Lawyers & Consultants
ORDERS NSD 1203 of 2015
BETWEEN: IPC GLOBAL PTY LTD (ACN 168 265 156) Applicant
AND: PAVETEST PTY LTD (ACN 160 146 083) First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate