Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Biomax Technologies Pte Ltd v Jabiru Agribusiness (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 505 File number: NSD 567 of 2015
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2016
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 36(1A), 115 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt VB Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Searson v Salmon [2014] FCA 748
Date of hearing: 5 February 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Commercial Contracts, Banking, Finance and Insurance
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms E E Whitby
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: The First and Second Respondents did not appear
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr R Hawkins
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Henry Davis York
ORDERS NSD 567 of 2015
BETWEEN: BIOMAX TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD (RC NO 200906670E) Applicant
AND: JABIRU AGRIBUSINESS (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 097 142 455) First Respondent
RAYMOND FREDERICK BEAZLEIGH Second Respondent
IRONSIDE MANAGEMENT (SERVICES) PTY LTD (ACN 010 593 293) Third Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 5 FEBRUARY 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate