Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rinehart v Rinehart (No 3) [2016] FCA 539 File number: NSD 1124 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 26 May 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – commercial arbitration – interlocutory application seeking an order that the proceedings be referred to arbitration – whether the applicants had entered into an agreement to resolve the dispute by arbitration – whether the applicants are disentitled from seeking certain relief because of a contractual agreement to resolve disputes the subject of the proceeding by arbitration – should the Court direct that there be a trial to decide whether any or all of the arbitration agreements are null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed – there be a trial of whether five of the agreements to arbitrate are null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether s 8(1) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2010 (NSW) or the Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) ("commercial arbitration legislation") is 'picked up' by s 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – what is the meaning of 'domestic commercial arbitration' in the commercial arbitration legislation – what facts must the party seeking referral to arbitration establish to engage s 8(1) of the arbitration legislation – to what standard of proof must these facts be established – does the Court have discretion to decide or not decide whether an arbitration agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate