Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ashby v Slipper (No 2) [2016] FCA 550 File number: NSD 580 of 2012
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 19 May 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – release from implied undertaking – jurisdiction of Court after proceeding concluded – considerations to be taken into account – the facilitation of a criminal investigation PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – power to make supplemental orders after conclusion of proceedings – application made by a former party
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Ashby v Commonwealth (No 4) [2012] FCA 1411, (2012) 209 FCR 65 Ashby v Slipper [2014] FCA 973 Ashby v Slipper [2014] FCAFC 15, (2014) 219 FCR 322 Ashby v Slipper [2016] FCAFC 63 Ashby v Slipper (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 67, (2014) 194 ALD 10 Australian Trade Commission v McMahon (1997) 73 FCR 211 Bailey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1995] 1 Qd R 476 Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 45 FCR 224 Camp Curlewis Resorts Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Branson J, 20 December 1994) Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36, (2008) 235 CLR 125 Holpitt Pty Ltd v Varimu Pty Ltd (1991) 29 FCR 576 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3, (2005) 218 ALR 283 Plate Glass Holdings Pty Ltd v Fraser Gordon Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1487 Websyte Corporation Pty Ltd v Alexander [2012] FCA 69, (2012) 95 IPR 344
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate