Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 553 File numbers: WAD 6005 of 2003 WAD 750 of 2015
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 10 March 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – abuse of process – inherent power of court to prevent abuse of process and protect itself from such abuse – distinctions and common aspects of protective and summary powers to dismiss proceedings as abuse of process – substantial unexplained delay by neighbouring party in commencing native title proceedings – new proceedings directly affecting conduct and possible result of part-heard trial – neighbouring party knowing of existing proceedings for many years and permitting them to continue after elders of both claim groups had earlier agreed common boundaries – new claim now over substantial overlapping area – false explanation for some delay – necessity to hear new claim with part-heard trial by force of s 67(1) of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – hearing of new claim would have significant impact on and require retaking of evidence in part-heard trial – where new claim would cause significant prejudice to current proceedings – where some relevant witnesses now dead PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – application for summary judgment striking out an overlapping native title claim pursuant to s 31A of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where new claim and evidence on summary dismissal application fails to assert any spiritual connection to the overlap land claimed – where juridical basis for claim to native title is essentially spiritual connection of claim group to land and waters claimed – where no evidence of new claimant's spiritual connection to land and waters – whether proceeding has any reasonable prospects of success PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of case management principles under ss 37M and 37N of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where substantial delay in bringing overlapping native title claim – where significant prejudice to current proceedings if new claim proceeds – where long running native title proceedings currently on foot would be significantly disrupted NATIVE TITLE – application to be joined as party to a native title proceeding pursuant to s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether applicant a person whose interests might be affected by determination of native title – where applicant for joinder also involved in another very recent native title application claiming area overlapping existing claim area – where overlapping native title claim dismissed as abuse of process and as having no reasonable prospect of success – where unexplained delay in bringing application for joinder – where no evidence that applicant for joinder had spiritual connection to land claimed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate