Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 556 Appeal from: Kaur & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 3533
File number(s): VID 2 of 2016
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 20 May 2016
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 1.61, 1.61(1), 1.61(5), 36.03, 36.03(a)(i) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 97
Cases cited: SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 Trivedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 169
Date of hearing: 5 May 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 37
Counsel for the Appellants: The first and second appellants appeared in person and on behalf of the third appellant
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms L A Helsdon of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS VID 2 of 2016
BETWEEN: RAJWINDER KAUR First Appellant
JAGROOP SINGH Second Appellant
CHARANJOT SINGH CHAHAL Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 20 May 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal filed on 4 January 2016 be dismissed. 2. The interlocutory application filed on 4 January 2016 be dismissed. 3. The appellants pay the first respondent's costs, as taxed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate