Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Delis v Tax Practitioners' Board [2016] FCA 570 Appeal from: Delis and Tax Practitioners' Board [2015] AATA 820
File number: VID 797 of 2015
Judge: DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 24 May 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for renewal of registration as tax agent – whether first applicant was a fit and proper person – relevant considerations – where failure to comply with taxation laws – where Commissioner of Taxation had remitted penalties and interest – where applicant gave evidence of ill-health – Tax Agent Services Act 2009 s 20-5 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – application for renewal of registration as tax agent – whether first applicant was a fit and proper person – procedural fairness – where applicant gave evidence of ill-health – whether obligation to request additional evidence –Tax Agent Services Act 2009 s 20-5
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 33.12(2) Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 20-5, 20-15, 30-10(2)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Saxby Bridge Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2003) 133 FCR 290; [2003] FCAFC 244 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 233 FCR 315; [2015] FCAFC 92 Osland v Secretary, Department of Justice (No 2) (2010) 241 CLR 320; [2010] HCA 24 Toohey v Tax Agents' Board of Victoria (2007) 171 FCR 291; [2007] FCA 431
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate