Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 574 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Singh v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 276
File number: NSD 288 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 19 May 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Medical evidence required to secure the adjournment of the hearing of an appeal – formulaic medical certificate will not usually suffice – need for evidence on oath of a medical practitioner – where proposed appeal cannot succeed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), rr 44.12, 44.12(1)(a), 44.12(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 35.11(a) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), cll 602.213, 602.213(5), item 3001 of Schedule 3
Cases cited: AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 40 Decor Corporation Pty Limited v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397
Date of hearing: 19 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms C Saunders, DLA Piper Australia
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice save as to costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate