Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 6) [2016] FCA 622 File number: QUD 574 of 2010
Judge: EDELMAN J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend originating application and statement of claim immediately before trial – whether delay satisfactorily explained – where application is essentially concerned with a matter of law – where amendment would have had the effect of expediting the trial by two and a half years – circumstances of prejudice to respondents
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 79, 180, 180(1), 181, 206C, 206C(1)(b), 206E, 206E(a)(i), 206E(1)(a)(i), 206E(1)(a)(iii), 206E(2), 912A(1)(a), 945A(1)(b), 1041E(1), 1324, 1324(1), 1324(6) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M(1), 37M(2) Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 8.21, 8.21(1)(g)(i), 16.51, 16.53
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Securities & Investment Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; (2002) 42 ACSR 80 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd (No 6) [2011] FCA 811; (2011) 84 ACSR 703 Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Rich [2003] NSWSC 186; (2003) 44 ACSR 682 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lindberg (No 2) [2010] VSCA 19; (2010) 26 VR 355 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Maxwell [2006] NSWSC 1052; (2006) 59 ACSR 373 Ketteman v Hansel Properties [1987] AC 18 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Rich v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; (2004) 220 CLR 129 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm), in the matter of Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) [2015] FCA 1098 Tamaya Resources Limited (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2016] FCAFC 2 The Commonwealth v Verwayen [1990] HCA 39; (1990) 170 CLR 394
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate