Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 652 Appeal from: Singh & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 387
File number: NSD 377 of 2016
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2016
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg. 1.15C(a)
Date of hearing: 27 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellants: The appellants appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the Respondents: DLA Piper Australia
ORDERS NSD 377 of 2016
BETWEEN: AMANDEEP SINGH First Appellant
PAWANDEEP KAUR Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 27 MAY 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellants to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
NORTH J:
introduction 1 Before the Court is an appeal from orders made by the Federal Circuit Court on 22 October 2014. The Federal Circuit Court dismissed an application for review of a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal, now the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, made on 29 November 2013. The Tribunal affirmed a decision of the delegate of the first respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, to refuse the appellants' Skilled (Residence) (Class VB) (subclass 885) visas (885 visas).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate