Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chen v Birbilis [2016] FCA 661 File number: VID 18 of 2016
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2016
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 117(3), 340-342, 351, 365, 368(3)(a), 368(4), 370 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 26.01 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) s 94(2)
Cases cited: Chen v Monash University [2016] FCAFC 66 Walker v State of Victoria [2012] FCAFC 38
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 4 April 2016 (Respondent) 9 May 2016 (Applicant)
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms R Nelson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Lander and Rogers Lawyers
ORDERS VID 18 of 2016
BETWEEN: QIZHI CHEN Applicant
AND: NICK BIRBILIS First Respondent
EDWINA CORNISH Second Respondent
MONASH UNIVERSITY Third Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JUNE 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The proceeding is dismissed. 2. The applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate