Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Austshade Pty Ltd v Boss Shade Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 663 File number: QUD 189 of 2012
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – amending pleadings – where applicants sought to amend a third further amended statement of claim after reasons for judgment published
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 5 May 2016
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr A Musgrave
Solicitor for the Applicants: Burns & Associates
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr M Byrne of Lillas & Loel Lawyers
ORDERS QUD 189 of 2012
BETWEEN: AUSTSHADE PTY LTD ACN 066 409 247 First Applicant
EKKEHARD SIEGFRIED HARTMUT KOEHN Second Applicant
AND: BOSS SHADE PTY LTD ACN 115 280 272 First Respondent
BAUER INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 010 865 068 Second Respondent
HOLGER BAUER (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
JUDGE: DOWSETT J DATE OF ORDER: 3 JUNE 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. leave be granted to the applicants to file and serve a further amended originating application and a fourth further amended statement of claim, such amendments being limited to the addition of a claim for recovery of a debt in the amount of $1,050 owed by the first respondent to the first applicant, pursuant to a deed between those parties executed on 30 November 2010; 2. such further amended originating application and fourth further amended statement of claim be filed and served within 7 days of the publication of these reasons; 3. in default of compliance with the order as to filing and service, the grant of leave to amend be revoked; 4. the first applicant have leave to enter judgment against the first respondent in the amount of $1,050, unless payment of such sum is tendered to the first applicant in cash or by bank cheque, within 14 days of the filing and serving of the said amended documents, or otherwise as agreed between the parties, and that such non-payment may be proven by affidavit sworn on behalf of, and with the authorization of the first applicant; 5. the applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings; 6. the parties have liberty to apply concerning the payment or non-payment of the said sum of $1,050; and 7. the action be otherwise dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate