Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 682 File number: TAD 29 of 2015
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 9 June 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision made by the Minister personally to cancel applicant's visa pursuant to s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where Minister found that the applicant failed the character test under s 501(6)(b) – whether the Minister exercised his power to cancel the applicant's visa on the erroneous footing that the applicant would have a meaningful opportunity to make representations seeking the revocation of the decision – whether invitation to make representations futile because applicant could not pass the character test because he had been sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than 12 months
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 501, 501(3), 501(5), 501(6)(a), 501(6)(b), 501(6)(d)(v), 501(7)(c), 501A, 501A(3), 501C, 501C(1)(b), 501C(2), 501C(3), 501C(3)(b), 501C(4)(b), 501CA, 501CA(2)
Cases cited: Applicants M1015/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1309 – cited NBMW v Minister for Immigration (No 2) (2014) 222 FCR 376 – distinguished Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 – cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 – cited Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 – applied Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 226 FCR 154 – followed Vella v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 230 FCR 61 – cited VHAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 80 ALD 559 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate