Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] FCA 706 File number: NSD 2082 of 2011
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 10 June 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether costs orders made against respondents should be stayed pending the determination of the appeal
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.13
Cases cited: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] FCA 567 Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1372 Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 5) [2016] FCA 444
Date of hearing: 19 May 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Patents and associated Statutes
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants/Cross-Respondents Mr JM Hennessey SC with Ms F St John
Solicitor for the Applicants/Cross-Respondents Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the Respondents/Cross-Claimant: Mr BJ Hess QC with Dr LJ Duncan
Solicitor for the Respondents/Cross-Claimant: Jackson McDonald
ORDERS NSD 2082 of 2011
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN MUD COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 009 283 416) First Applicant
REFLEX INSTRUMENTS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate