Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walsh v Umoona Tjutagku Health Service Aboriginal Corporation (ICN 7460) [2016] FCA 716 File number(s): SAD 80 of 2015
Judge(s): CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 16 June 2016
Legislation: Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) s 469.5
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1993) 43 FCR 1
Date of hearing: 10 June 2016
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment and Industrial Relations
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents Mr B Roberts SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: NDA Law
ORDERS SAD 80 of 2015
BETWEEN: ALEXANDRA JANE WALSH Applicant
AND: UMOONA TJUTAGKU HEALTH SERVICE ABORIGINAL CORPORATION (ICN 7460) First Respondent
PRISCILLA MAGDALENE LARKINS Second Respondent
JUDGE: CHARLESWORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 16 JUNE 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Subparagraph 18(h) of the third statement of claim is struck out. 2. The applicant has leave to file a fourth statement of claim incorporating the following: (a) the amendments foreshadowed in the opening words to paragraph 18 of Exhibit A, except for the words "and Officers of the first respondent and their family"; (b) the amendments foreshadowed in subparagraphs 18(b), (p), (q), (w) and (ff) of Exhibit A; (c) the insertion of the words "including by victimising her husband" after the word "Applicant" in the opening words to paragraph 19. 3. The applicant is to pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to her interlocutory application of 3 June 2016. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate