Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brosnan v Katke [2016] FCA 717 File number: QUD 384 of 2012
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 15 June 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of the disposition of the costs of the principal proceeding deferred pending publication of Orders and Reasons for Judgment by the Full Court on 12 January 2016 in an appeal by the applicants from the Orders of the primary Judge – consideration of the exercise of the discretion as to costs in light of a Calderbank offer made by the respondents to the applicants and in light of affidavit material filed by the parties
Date of hearing: 15 June 2016
Date of last submissions: 21 May 2015
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Solicitors for the Applicants: Mills Oakley Lawyers
Solicitors for the Respondents: Johnson Winter & Slattery
ORDERS QUD 384 of 2012
BETWEEN: MICHAEL BROSNAN First Applicant
LEON BROSNAN Second Applicant
MARY BROSNAN (and others named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
AND: JEFFREY JAMES KATKE First Respondent
METAGENICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 113 937 572) Second Respondent
METAGENICS INC (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 15 JUNE 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants pay the costs of the first to fourth respondents of and incidental to the proceeding including reserved costs, subject to Orders 2 and 3 on a party and party basis up to and including 6 January 2014 and, from 6 January 2014 on an indemnity basis. 2. The costs of the respondents of and incidental to an interlocutory application heard and determined before her Honour Justice Collier on 16 August 2013 and reserved by her Honour do not form part of the reserved costs for the purposes of Order 1 of these Orders, and as to the costs so reserved by her Honour Justice Collier, the first to fourth respondents pay the applicants' costs of and incidental to that application on a party and party basis. 3. The reserved costs of and incidental to the interlocutory application filed by the respondents on 12 September 2012 be paid by the applicants on a party and party basis subject to the consideration that in calculating the amount of such costs, those costs shall not include any costs of and incidental to the preparation and filing of the affidavit of Justin Anthony McDonnell sworn 12 September 2012. 4. Pursuant to Section 23 and Section 37P of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), Rule 1.32 and Rule 1.36 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 and Order 1 of the Orders made on 23 April 2015, these Orders and the Reasons for Judgment in support of these Orders are made and published from Chambers. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate