Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hatfield on behalf of the Darumbal People v State of Queensland (No 3) [2016] FCA 723 File number: QUD 6131 of 1998
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2016
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application under s 61(1) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – central Queensland coastal area – agreement by parties under s 87A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether Court satisfied it has power to make consent orders proposed by parties – whether Court considers it appropriate to make orders sought by parties – whether Court satisfied there is a proceeding in relation to application for a determination of native title – whether Court satisfied all relevant persons are parties to the agreement – nomination of prescribed body corporate – whether native title exists – anthropology and history of claim area and claim group – evidence of claim group members – evidence of historical and ongoing connection – ongoing engagement by claim group members with traditional customs and teachings – evidence of claim group members engaging in traditional activities
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 56, 57, 61(1), 67, 87A, 87A(1)(a), 87A(1)(b), 87A(1)(c), 87A(1)(d), 87A(4)(a), 87A(4)(b), 223(1), 225 Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth) Explanatory Memorandum to the Native Title Amendment Act 2007 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate